Your article has a lead and a body. Now learn how to close it the right way โ with a kicker that lands, instead of an article that just stops.
Last time, you wrote the body of your article.
You've got a nut graf. You've got evidence. You've got quotes from experts and community members.
Your article is doing great.
But here's where a lot of beginning writers make one final mistake. They just... stop.
The last paragraph ends. The article cuts off. The reader looks at the page thinking: That's it? Really?
A good science article doesn't stop. It ends. And there's a big difference between the two.
A good ending does three things.
Just like leads, endings come in different types. Here are the five you need to know.
The quotation kicker ends your article with a powerful quote from one of your sources. It works best when the quote captures the heart of your story in a way no summary paragraph could.
"'I just wanted clean water for my family,' said Daisy, now in Grade 6. 'I didn't know it would help the whole barangay too.'" Closes on a human note โ brings the reader back to the person at the center of it all.
"'Science is important,' said the teacher." A quotation kicker needs a quote that carries emotional weight or says something specific โ not something generic.
The anecdotal kicker closes with a brief, real-life moment or scene that echoes the story's main idea. It's like the anecdotal lead โ but in reverse. Instead of opening with a moment to pull the reader in, you close with a moment that sends them off with something to think about.
"Last Tuesday, three weeks after the solar lamp was installed, the lights in Room 4 were still on at six in the evening..." That scene closes the loop โ we started with a problem, we end with it solved.
"The students were happy. Science is useful in everyday life." An anecdotal kicker needs a specific, vivid moment โ not a general statement about happiness and science.
The circular kicker brings your story back to something from your opening. It creates a loop โ connecting your ending directly to your lead or your anecdotal opening. This one feels especially satisfying to readers. It's like the story folded neatly back into itself.
"Every morning before school, Daisy checks the small solar panel on her family's roof. She built it herself from scrap materials โ and it's been powering their kitchen lights for three months."
"This morning, like every morning, Daisy climbed up to check the panel before school. It was still working perfectly. But now three more families on her street have asked her to build one for them too."
See that? We're back with Daisy. We're back on the roof. But everything has changed since the opening. That loop is exactly what makes a circular kicker so effective.
The twist kicker closes with a surprising fact, detail, or turn that the reader didn't see coming. It leaves the reader slightly surprised โ in a good way.
"...She found out about the invitation during her Math class โ in the middle of a long division quiz." The last detail is funny and human. The reader smiles. They remember Ziah.
"In conclusion, science is very important and we should all support young scientists." Science journalism doesn't need "in conclusion." It needs a specific, surprising detail.
The call-to-action kicker closes by pointing the reader toward something they can do, watch for, or think about next. It works best for science stories about ongoing issues โ problems that haven't been fully solved yet, or solutions that still need support.
"The barangay's water testing results are expected to be released next month. Residents are encouraged to contact the barangay health office if they notice changes..." Practical. Gives the reader something to do.
"Everyone should care about water. Clean water is important for all of us." A call-to-action kicker needs a specific, real next step โ not just a general reminder.
So how do you pick the right one?
Ask yourself: Does this ending leave my reader with something? Something to think about. Something to feel. Something to do. If the answer is no โ try a different kicker type.
Same story โ a student who built a rainwater collector. Two different endings. Let's see why one works and one doesn't.
Apply what you learned. Work through the activities below step by step.
| What to Check | Done โ | Try Again ๐ |
|---|---|---|
| My ending does not summarize the article | โ | โ |
| My ending does not start with "In conclusion" | โ | โ |
| My ending is three sentences or less | โ | โ |
| My ending leaves the reader with something to think about | โ | โ |
| I identified my kicker type and explained my choice | โ | โ |
Answers for writing activities will be different for each student. Use the rubric above or ask your teacher for help.
Click the scrambled word groups in the right order to build a true statement about science article endings.
Your article now has a lead, a body, and an ending โ a complete science article. Next, learn how to write a headline strong enough to make someone want to read it in the first place.